Author Topic: Saga Rose (ex Sagafjord, ex Gripsholm)  (Read 68461 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Twynkle

Saga Rose (ex Sagafjord, ex Gripsholm)
« on: Aug 05, 2009, 11:49 PM »
News of Saga's replacement for Saga Rose
 
http://www.maritimematters.com/shipnews.html

« Last Edit: May 29, 2010, 05:45 PM by Isabelle Prondzynski »

Offline Chris

Re: Something about Saga!
« Reply #1 on: Aug 07, 2009, 07:05 AM »
She will look smart in the Saga colours, however it is sad to see the ex.Sagafjord leave - it was nice for her and ex. Vistafjord to be reunited at the end of their careers.
🎥 Check out my QE2 & Cruise Ship Videos: https://www.youtube.com/chrisframeofficial/

Online Rob Lightbody

  • Administrator
  • Queens Grill Diner
  • *****
  • Posts: 12307
  • Total likes: 15784
  • Helping to Keep The Legend Alive
    • Rob Lightbody dot com
Saga Rose
« Reply #2 on: Aug 17, 2009, 10:14 PM »
Are you reading this, Cunard?!

http://www.dailyecho.co.uk/news/4549595.Ship_to_become_floating_hotel_in_city/

Quote

AFTER almost half a century sailing the oceans few ships are as closely emblematic of the glorious history of cruising as the Saga Rose.


I can think of one...

Quote
her owners are considering exciting plans to keep her in the city which has long been her home .... and is keen to keep her as a hotel catering for up to 460 cruise guests and the general public.

Wonder if "our" ship's owners ever considered such a thing..

Quote

If it goes ahead she would sit alongside the Ocean Liner Experience which entrepreneurs


You all know what I want to say next!!

Quote
The idea has the enthusiastic backing of city business leaders and politicians..... "We would be absolutely delighted if the Saga Rose was to become a permanent fixture in Southampton..."

Would they have been so enthusiastic about keeping QE2?  Surely they would??

I'm not saying Saga Rose isn't nice.  She is, and I'm over the moon if they manage to save her, and I will go for a visit but...
« Last Edit: Dec 07, 2009, 04:04 PM by Rob Lightbody »
Passionate about QE2's service life for 40 years and creator of this website.  I have worked in IT for 28 years and created my personal QE2 website in 1994.

Online Isabelle Prondzynski

Re: Saga Rose
« Reply #3 on: Aug 17, 2009, 11:19 PM »

Wonder if "our" ship's owners ever considered such a thing..


Well, I certainly know a couple of senior-ish people on board QE2 who did -- but were not asked. They suggested QE2 should have been berthed as a hotel in Southampton, under Cunard ownership, where she could have served as a hotel for those passengers arriving early to board their cruises next day, or wishing to spend an extra night in the area after disembarking.

Additionally (and I thought this a very interesting point!), they said that Cunard each year spends a small fortune putting up its own crews in the hotels of Southampton prior to their rejoining their ships -- having their own floating hotel in Southampton could have helped to ease those expenses and given the crew members a familiar place to stay!

Best of luck to Saga Rose -- I would be delighted to see her preserved in Southampton, and shall certainly make a point of visiting her very soon if it works out well for her... but... ... ...

And perhaps Saga Rose has benefited from the outcry surrounding QE2's sale to distant lands...

Offline Andy F

Re: Saga Rose
« Reply #4 on: Aug 18, 2009, 01:02 AM »
Just returned from Southampton and this made the front page of today's edition.
Start every day with a smile and get it over with

Offline Chris

Re: Saga Rose
« Reply #5 on: Aug 18, 2009, 01:57 AM »
It's great news for Saga Rose to have a future in the UK - ironic however that she should be retired to the UK considering she was one of the last liners built for the Norwegian America Line while QE2, the very epitome of British shipbuilding was sold off.

It seems to me that we are fortunate that Nakheel saw value in QE2 and that she at least was sold to an organisation who have thus far proved to care for "our" ship... it appears more and more as if QE2 really never had a chance for retirement in the UK.
🎥 Check out my QE2 & Cruise Ship Videos: https://www.youtube.com/chrisframeofficial/

Offline Andrew Collier

Re: Saga Rose
« Reply #6 on: Aug 20, 2009, 02:47 PM »
With the passing of QE2 the two Saga ships, Saga Rose and Saga Ruby became the last quality classic liners serving the UK. Once Saga Rose is withdrawn, there will be only one, and all of us under 50 are prevented from sailing on it.

Therefore I am thrilled that Saga Rose is to become a hotel, as this will at lease give us a change to go aboard and look around a classic liner in the UK, even if stationary, better than nothing!

Slight shame I live near enough Southampton to not really need to stay in a hotel there though  ;)
The Virtual Staff Captain

Offline Andrew Collier

Re: Something about Saga!
« Reply #7 on: Aug 20, 2009, 02:54 PM »
Maybe they can do something about the funnel? I do hope so.... ;D
The Virtual Staff Captain

Online Isabelle Prondzynski

Re: Saga Rose
« Reply #8 on: Aug 20, 2009, 03:00 PM »
Don't know whether it's of any use to you, Andy...  :-\   ... but Saga do take passengers over 40, provided they are "chaperoned" by another passenger over 50. Sadly, for those under 40, the only advice I can give is hurry up !

As for needing a hotel in Southampton -- how about needing to travel on a ship that is not simply delivering you to your destination (i.e. taking a cruise)? See it as a wee holiday in its own right, with the added advantage that Southampton is within easy reach for you... which it is not for some of us...

And by the way, Saga Rose is a beautiful ship, as even my non shippy colleagues decided recently, when we came upon her quite unexpectedly in Dublin Port :

https://www.flickr.com/photos/prondis_in_kenya/sets/72157619524907437/detail/
« Last Edit: Aug 20, 2009, 03:05 PM by Isabelle Prondzynski »

Offline Andrew Collier

Re: Saga Rose
« Reply #9 on: Aug 20, 2009, 03:30 PM »
Oh don't worry Isabelle, I won't let need actually stop me going! Just easier to justify the expense if so  ;)

Saga Rose is indeed a very beautiful ship, eclipsed only by QE2 and maybe Saga Ruby, Ruby is slighty larger and has it bridge a deck higher, and a second row of large plate windows down the sides, sublt differences, but they do just give it the edge, IMHO!

Aaaages to go till 40, Ruby will be out of service by then, not complained bout the age thing thoo, i'd just liek to go on it now as I am, maybe i'll have to join the crew, or are they all over 40 too?

Nice photos, btw, thanks for the link!

The Virtual Staff Captain

LegendOfTheSeas

  • Guest
Re: Saga Rose
« Reply #10 on: Aug 21, 2009, 06:08 PM »
With the passing of QE2 the two Saga ships, Saga Rose and Saga Ruby became the last quality classic liners serving the UK. Once Saga Rose is withdrawn, there will be only one, and all of us under 50 are prevented from sailing on it.

The Saga age limit has always annoyed me - apart from not being able to go in some great ships isn't ageism illegal? Or does that only apply when discriminating against those over 50?  ???

Still, I'll be over 40 after January 2010 so if I can persuade an over-50 friend or relative they want to go on a Saga cruise...  ;)
« Last Edit: Aug 21, 2009, 07:03 PM by LegendOfTheSeas »

Offline highlander0108

Saga Ruby Bow Damage
« Reply #11 on: Oct 11, 2009, 08:28 PM »
We saw the Ruby in Manhattan yesterday and noticed some damage to the bow.  Does anyone here know how that happened and if the ship was going to be repaired before sailing back home?  I posted photos here:

http://qe2-prideoftheclyde.blogspot.com/2009/10/new-york-october-10-2009.html

The Ruby, ex Caronia, was a welcome sight and I could see QE2 moored here along with the Concorde.  She'd be right at home!  Check out the photo at the end of the posting.  

Ken
"There will never be another one like her" QE2's last Master Ian McNaught
My Blog:  http://qe2-prideoftheclyde.blogspot.com/

Online Isabelle Prondzynski

Re: Saga Ruby Bow Damage
« Reply #12 on: Oct 11, 2009, 10:16 PM »
I enjoyed your write-up and the pictures, Ken!

As for Saga Ruby, this message was sent by Bob Allen to Liners' List yesterday :

Quote
SAGA RUBY collided with Pier 88 this morning while docking.  Repairs will take place in Bayonne, NJ before she sails for England, most likely tomorrow or Monday.

We were at Pier 88 on QE2 last September and continued our voyage unscathed... but this is also where the Normandie burnt and sank... a historic place.
« Last Edit: Oct 11, 2009, 10:21 PM by Isabelle Prondzynski »

Offline Twynkle

Re: Something about Saga!
« Reply #13 on: Nov 19, 2009, 11:43 PM »
Saga Rose and Cork Harbour (Cobh) are both featured in the December edition of Ships Monthly!
as well as in Shipping - December issue
« Last Edit: Dec 10, 2009, 06:03 PM by Twynkle »

Online Rob Lightbody

  • Administrator
  • Queens Grill Diner
  • *****
  • Posts: 12307
  • Total likes: 15784
  • Helping to Keep The Legend Alive
    • Rob Lightbody dot com
Re: Saga Rose
« Reply #14 on: Dec 07, 2009, 04:04 PM »
Passionate about QE2's service life for 40 years and creator of this website.  I have worked in IT for 28 years and created my personal QE2 website in 1994.

 

Saga Ruby (ex-Caronia and ex-Vistafjord)

Started by Stowaway2kBoard Saga Ruby

Replies: 88
Views: 34680
Last post Oct 25, 2017, 06:42 PM
by Twynkle
Saga Ruby Re-fit

Started by tdicksonBoard Saga Ruby

Replies: 7
Views: 4312
Last post Feb 14, 2013, 09:07 PM
by pete cain
New ship(s) for Saga

Started by pete cainBoard Sea Shanties

Replies: 6
Views: 2047
Last post Oct 25, 2015, 09:55 PM
by Greg Rudd
Saga Ruby web sites

Started by Isabelle ProndzynskiBoard Saga Ruby

Replies: 0
Views: 11709
Last post Dec 23, 2011, 06:33 PM
by Isabelle Prondzynski
Pete Cain's final cruise on Saga Ruby (August / September 2013)

Started by Isabelle ProndzynskiBoard Saga Ruby

Replies: 111
Views: 45031
Last post Aug 09, 2017, 11:31 PM
by Andy Holloway