The QE2 Story Discussion Forum - Keeping The Legend Alive

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
September 10, 2010, 05:27:54 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
TheQE2Story LIVE from Clydebank - 20-Sep-2010 - http://qe2.eventbrite.com/ in association with Clyde Walking Tours
23934 Posts in 1331 Topics by 655 QE2 Fans
Latest QE2 fan: JR

* Home Home Home QE2 Shop Help Login Register
+  The QE2 Story Discussion Forum
|-+  The QE2's Story
| |-+  QE2's Predecessors : Queen Elizabeth & Queen Mary (Moderator: singlemalt)
| | |-+  How much did they cost, in todays money
0 QE2 Fans and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 Go Down Print
Author Topic: How much did they cost, in todays money  (Read 190 times) Bookmark and Share
Rob Lightbody
Administrator
Queens Grill Diner
*****
Online Online

Location: Glasgow, UK
Posts: 2345


Helping to Keep The Legend Alive

Google Talk lightbody
WWW
« on: June 03, 2010, 01:42:59 PM »

How much did Queen Elizabeth and Queen Mary cost to construct, in today's money?  Not only were they very advanced and powerful etc., but no expense was spared on their interiors.

How much would it cost to build an equivalent ship today - e.g. best in the world, biggest, fastest, with absolutely the most luxurious interiors afloat with the very best materials from every corner of the world, designed by the very best British designers of today.
Logged

Twynkle
Queens Grill Diner
*****
Offline Offline

Location: not far from London
Posts: 2770


Rosie


« Reply #1 on: June 03, 2010, 02:24:44 PM »

Queen Mary cost £3,500,00 in 1934 (I think!)
 £1.00 in 1934 = £51.70 (retail price index 2008!)
Therefore if she was built to the same spec as then - with 'best everything',
and if I have done the sums right - she would cost roundabout £180,950,000

Cunard took out a loan in 1937/8 (I think!) from the government of £5,000,000 for Queen Elizabeth
That would be £258,500,000 today

Her exact cost might well be found in Clive Harvey's good book!
Logged

QE2 has been alongside in Dubai for 653 days...
Peter Mugridge
Princess Grill Diner
****
Offline Offline

Location: Epsom, Surrey, UK
Posts: 605


At Mach 2 three days after being on QE2...

Peter_Mugridge
WWW
« Reply #2 on: June 03, 2010, 02:29:09 PM »

I think it might be more than that because the RPI is only an average and I would imagine that the specialist skills involved in some of the areas would have gone up at a higher rate?

Interesting question - I will try to delve into this a bit myself later.
Logged

"It is a capital mistake to allow any mechanical object to realise that you are in a hurry!"
Twynkle
Queens Grill Diner
*****
Offline Offline

Location: not far from London
Posts: 2770


Rosie


« Reply #3 on: June 03, 2010, 02:36:40 PM »

Why not try ordering one, Peter  Smiley

Labour was very cheap in those days, certainly in Liverpool.
 - it would have been the parts that 'cost'!
Logged
Peter Mugridge
Princess Grill Diner
****
Offline Offline

Location: Epsom, Surrey, UK
Posts: 605


At Mach 2 three days after being on QE2...

Peter_Mugridge
WWW
« Reply #4 on: June 03, 2010, 02:43:34 PM »

Labour costs is why shipbuilding has moved to production line methods and to areas of the World where wages are lower isn't it?

Another factor, the technology is a lot more these days, all those computerised systems although I think you would want to compare directly assuming the same 1930s technlogy on board?


But look at the price tag for the new RN Type 45 Destroyers - £1 billion for each ship!
Logged
flagship
Global Moderator
Princess Grill Diner
*****
Online Online

Posts: 539


« Reply #5 on: June 04, 2010, 12:25:30 PM »

You have to take into account the price of steel and the type of steel required. They were all-steel ships like QM2 which added considerably to her build cost.
Logged
Pages: 1 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Find us on Facebook  Twitter